DEVELOPING NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) ORIENTED-BASED ETHNOSCIENCE TEACHING MATERIALS: IMPROVING CONSTRUCTING EXPLANATION AND DESIGNING SOLUTIONS (CEDs) SKILLS FOR PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Authors

  • Duhita Savira Wardani IKIP Siliwangi, Indonesia
  • Rahman Rahman
  • Zaqiyah Lailatul Farihah
  • Ryan Dwi Puspita

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i4.3618

Keywords:

NGSS, CEDs Skills, Teaching Materials, Prospective Elementary School Teacher

Abstract

This study aims to produce teaching materials oriented to Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) that can improve the Construction Explanation and Designing Solutions (CEDs) skills of elementary school teacher candidates. This study uses the development research method (RnD) adapted from Borg & Gall. The 10 Borg&Gall development procedures were then modified into 8 stages which were adapted to the conditions in the field. The results of the study show that NGSS-oriented teaching materials are appropriate for use in learning with valid, practical, and effective criteria. The validation results obtained from the average value of the teaching material expert validator and learning media show that the teaching material is considered valid both in terms of construct and content. The results of observing the activity of lecturers and students increasing at each meeting indicate that practical teaching materials are applied in learning, as well as the results of student CEDs skills tests indicating that teaching materials are effective for improving the CEDs skills of prospective teacher students. The implication of this research is that the use of appropriate methods can affect the achievement of CEDs ability of prospective teachers to be able to present various alternative solutions to problems. The suggestions for further research are to develop NGSS-oriented teaching materials for elementary school students.

Author Biography

Duhita Savira Wardani, IKIP Siliwangi

Elementary Education

References

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project- based learning and problem- based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100

Balemen, N., & Özer Keskin, M. (2018). The effectiveness of Project-Based Learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(4), 849–865. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/452/297

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M. D. G. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

Chiappetta, E.L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science Instruction in The Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills. United States Of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Creswell, W. J. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Engels, M., Miller, B., Squires, A., Jennewein, J., & Eitel, K. (2019). The Confluence Approach: Developing Scientific Literacy through Project-Based Learning and Place-Based Education in the Context of NGSS. Electronic Journal of Science Education.

Fulmer, G. W., Tanas, J., & Weiss, K. A. (2018). The challenges of alignment for the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21481

Hardy, I., & Campbell, T. (2020). Developing and supporting the Next Generation Science Standards: The role of policy entrepreneurs. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21566

Haverly, C., Lyle, A., Spillane, J. P., Davis, E. A., & Peurach, D. J. (2022). Leading instructional improvement in elementary science: State science coordinators’ sense-making about the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21767

Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1141

Kizkapan, O., & Bektas, O. (2017). The effect of project based learning on seventh grade students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1013a

Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2

Lattimer, H., & Riordan, R. (2011a). Project-Based Learning Engages Students in Meaningful Work: Students at High Tech Middle Engage in Project-Based Learning. Middle School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461797

Lattimer, H., & Riordan, R. (2011b). Project-Based Learning Engages Students in Meaningful Work. Middle School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461797

McMahon, A., & Clark Blickenstaff, J. (2020). Shifting Instruction to NGSS Engineering Practices: Strategies and Lessons Learned from Washington’s Statewide LASER Program. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17100

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201

Metz, S. (2016). Editor’s Corner: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions. The Science Teacher. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst16_083_01_6

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Science Teacher Associations (NSTA). (2011). Quality Science Education and 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from: https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/quality-science-education-and-21st-century-skills.

Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Volume 1: The Standards-Arranged by Disciplinary Core Ideas and by Topics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA, OECD Publishing,. In Pisa 2018.

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 Results What Student Student Know and Can Do. In PISA 2018 Results (Volume I).

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398

Pitaloka, N., Suyanta, S., & Huda, K. (2021). Improving Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Skills based on NGSS through Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-12-2020.2309170

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: A Introduction. In Educational Design Research.

Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0

Puspita, L. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530

RIZAL, M. (2012). Pengembangan Lks Fisika Berbasis Teori Kecerdasan Majemuk (Multiple Intelligence) Materi Alat Optik Pada Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 01 Madiun. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 120–127.

Rousseau, P. R., & Khomenko, N. (2011). IMPROVING PROBLEM SOLVING AND SOLUTION DESIGN SKILLS USING PROBLEM FLOW COACHES IN CAPSTONE PROJECTS. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3696

Santoso, P. H. (2019). KERANGKA PEMBELAJARAN NGSS DALAM MODEL PROJECT BASED LEARNING. Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika. https://doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v5i2.5946

SDCOE (San Diego Country Office of Education). (2007). Plan Tool for Contructing Explanation-Designing Solution. (San Diego: Resource Developed by C.Coch Rane and J.Spiegel). from https://ngss.sdcoe.net.

Tegeh, I. M., Jampel, I. N., & Pudjawan, K. (2015). PENGEMBANGAN BUKU AJAR MODEL PENELITIAN Analyze Implement Evaluate Design Develop. Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif Iv, Tahun 2015.

Uswatun Chasanah, A. R., Khoiri, N., & Nuroso, H. (2016). Efektivitas Model Project Based Learning terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Kalor Kelas X SMAN 1 Wonosegoro Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i1.1149

Wardani, D. S., Wulandari, M. A., Nurfurqon, F. F., & Kurniawati, D. (2021). STEM-INTEGRATED PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PJBL) MODEL AND LECTURE WITH EXPERIMENTS LEARNING MODEL: WHAT IS THE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY SKILLS OF ELEMENTARY TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN THESE LEARNING MODELS? Al-Bidayah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v13i1.634

Zajkov, O., & Mitrevski, B. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Dilemmas and Questions! Macedonian Physics Teacher.

Zarouk, M. Y., Olivera, E., & Khaldi, M. (2020). The impact of flipped project-based learning on self-regulation in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i17.14135

Downloads

Published

28-12-2022

Citation Check